Saturday, May 23, 2026

American Revolution - The Elephant in the Room

 

The Elephant in the Room


Elephants have a large footprint in idioms and popular culture.  They never forget. They turn pink when we have too much to drink. Though massive, they're said to fear tiny mice. When white, they show up as gifts that no one wants. They lead stampedes in Southeastern Conference football. They fly with their ears in Disney books and movies. They are symbols of political determination in the form of the American Republican party. They hang out in refrigerators for children's jokes. And they must be pointed out when in a room because even when everyone sees them, no one wants to talk about them.

On 7 June 1776, just days shy of 250 years ago Richard Henry Lee did exactly that. If the name Lee seems familiar to you, it should. He was a first cousin to Henry "Lighthorse Harry" Lee who was a successful officer of the American Revolution - famous for his contributions to the cause in his nighttime surprise attack in August of 1779 at the Battle of Paulus Hook, He was also a first cousin to Robert E. Lee who is famous for leading the Confederate forces in the American Civil War.  And, George Washington's niece married Richard Lee's son. If you believe the paper trail, I'm a fifth cousin to Richard Lee by way of a shared ancestor, Peter Stanley, (my 14th GGF).

Richard was deeply involved in colonial politics.  He was in the House of Burgesses from 1758 until it was dissolved.  He was a delegate to the First Continental Congress.  After the nation was formed, he was President of the Congress from 1784 to 1785 - and so, technically was a President of the United States before we started counting Presidents. He later served as a U.S. Senator from 1789 to 1792. 

But, in 1776, Richard's defining moment arrived. He stood, acknowledging the elephant in the room, declaring,  

"...these united colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown; and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved."

From those words came the momentum that produced the Declaration of Independence and a war for independence that followed. To borrow another idiom - "The die was cast!"

Ironically, it was during Robert E. Lee's struggle, nearly ninety years later, that the quest for "free and independent states" was lost.  In the Spring of 1865 - the Confederacy surrendered not only its armies but the claim that states could remain fully sovereign with the Union born of the Revolution. 

Also ironic is, while Richard pointed out the elephant that was the quest for independence, he, along with many planters of that era ignored another elephant. A significant portion of the population were not made free. That unacknowledged contradiction - between the ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the reality of slavery - became a wound that festered, split the nation, and continues to affect its future strength and unity. 

We ignore an obvious problem because the consequences of addressing it seem to be greater than the consequences of letting the elephant linger in the room. The consequence of Richard pointing out the elephant was a world war - but the reward was a new nation. The consequence of ignoring the elephant of slavery was a civil war and continued pain.

Choices always produce consequences. 

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Occupational Hazard - So, What Do You Do?

 

Great Grandfather - Redmond Rose in his Blacksmith Shop

"So, what do you do?" That is a question so often asked by one American to another.  It is the question that for many cultures is considered rude. Maybe its because it seems to try to put people into social classes. Maybe because for them work is not as closely tied to identity.

But, for Americans it is a very natural small talk opening.  It is a way to seek connection. The conversation might go something like this:

A: "So, what do you do?"

B: "I'm a teacher.  I've been a public-school teacher for 20 years."

A: "Wow! My brother is a teacher in Alabama. He teaches High School Science. What about you?"

And so on. This is all done - usually without judgement or with any intent to establish pecking order. Though, social ordering happens in this way, too, in some circles.

For Americans it is natural to ask - what did my ancestors do for an occupation?

As I looked along my family lines I, like many find farmers.  Some were small local farmers growing and raising enough for sustenance and community exchange while others were truly farming as a business venture.

In the late 18th and early 19th century a few of my ancestors stood out for doing things other than farming.  A direct paternal ancestor, Malcolm, was, in addition to farming, a militiaman and scout on the western frontier. His son, Sylvester, began as guard/bailiff, but his experience led him to the legal profession becoming a Justice of the Peace and ultimately a Probate Judge. He also was a tutor at times.

Another interesting profession during that time period was a second great-grandfather, Philip Blume, who was a saddler - first in his role during the War of 1812 and later as a profession. It is also possible that he dipped into investing into hospitality (Blume Hotel) and coal mining in his later years as his children were directly involved in the activities. Philip's mother, Elizabeth, mentions that her son, Jacob, "received the wine of life" indicating the good things were happening for him - and this is the time that the coal business was taking off for Jacob with his future brother-in-law.

One fourth great-grandfather, Timothy Bates, would have current conservative Christian fellowships spinning their heads. He came with his father, Ephriam, to Ohio because of a combination of opportunity and abolitionists beliefs developed under the influence of Jacob Green. Pioneers on the frontier and religiously zealous - Timothy preached on Sundays at a Christian Church that often met on his farm in his distillery using the whiskey barrels as benches.

Moving further into the 19th century my family followed the rivers. Monroe McCown was very entrepreneurial.  He was a lay Methodist minister, a fruit farmer, blacksmith, steamboat clerk and possibly pilot. His wife, Henrietta, owned a good bit of property in the main town and in the countryside - where she may have rented out property for others to farm. In her younger years she had been a seamstress and may have continued that activity as the opportunity arose. Their son, Sylvester, was similarly entrepreneurial.  Like his father, he apprenticed in blacksmithing, managed a fruit farm in Ohio, and he speculated on timber in Louisiana and Arkansas.

One second great-grandfather never came to America.  Zacharias Anderson, born in 1836 to a tenant farmer living in a backstuga in Naverstad, Sweden. He eventually moved to Grebbestad near the coast where he first tried cobbling - but changed his primary occupation to strandfiskare or beach fishing which consisted of cast net fishing, small boat usage, and fishing from the shore. When Zacharais' son, Oscar, came to the U.S. he would lean on those things he had learned from his father occupying himself as a boat captain, fisherman, bridge builder, and general construction contractor. I could see echoes of this fishing legacy while growing up in the panhandle of Florida where my grandmother and aunt, (Zacharias' grandchildren) would scoop crabs, gig flounder, and uncles would cast nets for mullet. Even today, I can't visit an Aquarium without getting hungry.

At the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries, two ancestors on opposite sides of the family tree set up general goods and sundry stores.





One, Robert Wylie, operated on the old routes - the rivers, specifically the Ohio. The other, William Ira Goad, operated on the new routes - the rail roads, along the L&N specifically in Repton, AL William's son-in-law, Alva Otto Huckaby, was a carpenter along the L&N and followed it south into Florida.

Fully into the 20th century both of my grandfathers were eventually employed by the federal government.  Before that, Herbert McCown, managed a small farm, worked in his cousin's coal mine, and traveled with a timber company. The government job allowed him to stay near the farm as he obtained a job with the Army Corp of Engineers with the hydroelectric dam operations on the Ohio. His wife, Nellie, with her love of books was a librarian. Ira Huckaby eventually worked for the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, first as a carpenter then as an estimator for the Public Works Department. Before that he was driving a taxi.

Dad farmed as a teen and worked in a jewelry store. But he quickly joined the Navy, He didn't stay in long.  He did, though, learn a skill and used it to get a contracting job with the USAF as an electronic technician, He used that skill for most of his career.  He later earned a college degree and retired as a computer specialist. 

As for me, my first official job was as an appliance installer for a small appliance store.  As I was going to college, I worked in the Couty School Art Department doing whatever needed to be done for the program administrator. After earning a degree, I began working for the USAF in software maintenance and weapon system analysis activities.

"What do you do?" is not the same as "Who are you?" or at least it shouldn't be. And yet, it gives a window into the skills a person possessed and the nature of life they experienced. Exploring the occupations of these ancestors works much the same for opening a window into their lives for those who inquire.

Thursday, May 7, 2026

American Revolution - Artful Recollections of Burgesses of Yore

Artwork from the 80s

While I was attending college I had the good fortune of having a college in my hometown and a job that permitted me to work part time.  The advantage of this is that I had no school loans when I finished school.  The job I had was working in the Art Department for the local school board district. My boss's name was Mary Jo Burgess. 

The teachers gave me a shirt I still have, and don't recall if I ever wore. I also collected a few handmade gifts each Christmas that I worked there - as that was a requirement of the gift exchange. The brown vase, I encountered at an auction in the 2000s - and I immediately recognized it by the signature on the bottom - as it was the same signature as the silkscreened owl I had received one year as a gift from one of the teachers.

How a guy who was addicted to playing sports and otherwise focused on math and science wound up working for the Art Department is a story in itself. Nonetheless it exposed me to a way of thinking and an area of interest that I would have neglected otherwise. 

I thought of Ms. Burgess this week as I read an article about the 250th Anniversary of the disbanding of the House of Burgesses in the Virginia Colony. Seeing the article - I began to wonder.  "Didn't I see that some of my ancestors were members of the House of Burgesses?" "Were they there on the day it disbanded or at events leading up to its final meeting?"

The House of Burgesses had formed in the earliest days of Jamestown in 1619 as an early self-governing body under the Virginia Company. It transitioned to being under the control of the British Crown in 1624; but by the 1640s the Burgesses were in charge of taxation and local laws. After Bacon’s Rebellion, the Crown increasingly tried to restrain the Burgesses’ power; however, the assembly continued to expand its authority and became the dominant political institution in Virginia. Consequently, Governor John Murray fourth Earl of Dunmore dissolved the assembly in May of 1774. Even so, some members continued meeting informally and sporadically until it completely disbanded on the sixth of May two years later.

The ancestor that I was recalling that had been a member of the House of Burgesses was an eighth great-grandfather, Christopher Robinson. He had been a member of the House of Burgesses from 1685 to 1693 during its time of increasing autonomy. Christopher's son and my seventh great-grandfather, John Robinson, was also a member of the House of Burgesses in 1711 and 1714.

John's father-in-law, and also my eighth great-grandfather, Robert Beverley, was also a member and clerk of the House of Burgesses. Robert was active in commanding Governor Berkeley's forces in defense against Nathaniel Bacon and his rebellion. However, when British commissioners arrived, he sided with the Burgesses against the King's representatives. He was blamed by King James II for disruption in the Colonies.

William Robinson, was my sixth great-grandfather in that lineage - but there is no evidence that he served in the House of Burgesses - though he, too, was active in the civic community. His brother (and therefore my uncle), John Robinson, did serve in the House of Burgesses from 1728 until his death in 1766. So, the family was a participant in the tradition from close to its beginning to near its waning days.

These Robinson, I came to discover after tracking down the name and true identity of my third great-grandmother, Sarah Jane Robinson. She was originally just a name on a slip of paper that my grandfather had written down for my dad. The original note said 'Robertson' instead of 'Robinson' - but it was enough to go on to track down documents that showed her actual name and lineage.
 
Well, this little diversion peregrinated from artful recollections to name associations, then brought us through some civic-minded family. In doing so it brings me to a question. Has the art of civic responsibility faded, or is it simply aimed at different civic challenges?




American Revolution - Declaring Independence

Signing of the Declaration of Independence I began celebrating, in my own way, the Semiquincentennial (250th) anniversary of the birth of th...